<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sIFR: More fonts for websites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dexodesign.com/2008/06/06/sifr-more-fonts-for-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dexodesign.com/2008/06/06/sifr-more-fonts-for-websites/</link>
	<description>Russell Wilson's blog about incremental/evolutionary design, navigation, layout, interaction design, information design and all things "software interface".</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.dexodesign.com/2008/06/06/sifr-more-fonts-for-websites/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dexodesign.com/?p=31#comment-112</guid>
		<description>It is an interesting idea. To me, what's striking is not its cleverness (it is very creative), but how much friction there still is in the ways we have to express our ideas on the web still. 

You have to ask, now that the internet is 20 years old, why should being able to choose any font you want still news worthy? It feels like technology is still somewhat of a hinderance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an interesting idea. To me, what&#8217;s striking is not its cleverness (it is very creative), but how much friction there still is in the ways we have to express our ideas on the web still. </p>
<p>You have to ask, now that the internet is 20 years old, why should being able to choose any font you want still news worthy? It feels like technology is still somewhat of a hinderance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
